| Author |
Message |
Demove6ltr
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:17 am Posts: 36 Location: Darwin NT
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:31 am |
|
|
Hey guys i have a 99 jimny with a buggered diff. The wreckers here in darwin have a 2010 jimny. Would that diff centre be able to go into mine?
thank you
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:33 am |
|
It would fit, But it may be the wrong ratio 
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
zuk85
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 656 Location: Sunshine coast
Vehicle: 07 vvt jimny
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:52 am |
|
|
I think u have the 4.1 and earlier mods from late 05 or 06 went to 4.3
A jimny master will correct me if im wrong, But im pretty sures it's right that u have a 4.1
_________________ sorry CHOP
Jimny's Are taking Over
|
|
|
|
 |
Demove6ltr
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:17 am Posts: 36 Location: Darwin NT
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:28 am |
|
|
ok but even if the ratios are different there shouldn't be a problem??
|
|
|
|
 |
monley

az supporter
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:58 am Posts: 11092 Location: Mandurah.W.A.
Vehicle: 84 LWB NT
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:43 am |
|
zuk85 wrote: I think u have the 4.1 and earlier mods from late 05 or 06 went to 4.3
A jimny master will correct me if im wrong, But im pretty sures it's right that u have a 4.1
The ratio is 4.09 not 4.1!!
_________________ Tell my arse, he actually gives a crap!
|
|
|
|
 |
monley

az supporter
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:58 am Posts: 11092 Location: Mandurah.W.A.
Vehicle: 84 LWB NT
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:44 am |
|
Demove6ltr wrote: ok but even if the ratios are different there shouldn't be a problem??
I think you will blow up the transfer case if you run 4.3 rear and 4.09 front
_________________ Tell my arse, he actually gives a crap!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:47 am |
|
monkey wrote: Demove6ltr wrote: ok but even if the ratios are different there shouldn't be a problem?? I think you will blow up the transfer case if you run 4.3 rear and 4.09 front
YES!!!
That would cause major problems, the transfer case will bind up very easily and blow or even the diff as mentioned by "Monkey" if both the front and rear have good traction.
Put the 4.3:1 ratio diffs in the front and back and you will have 5% reduction  .
|
|
|
|
 |
zuk85
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 656 Location: Sunshine coast
Vehicle: 07 vvt jimny
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:49 am |
|
|
4.09 then geeze lol
_________________ sorry CHOP
Jimny's Are taking Over
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:34 am |
|
|
4.09 x2! Stop the incorrect rumours of jims with 4.1.
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:47 am |
|
zuk85 wrote: 4.09 then geeze lol
whats your trye size and setup. 4.3's may be a bit of help for slightly larger tyres, 215/75R15???
|
|
|
|
 |
Demove6ltr
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:17 am Posts: 36 Location: Darwin NT
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:23 pm |
|
|
ATM I'm running standard tyres however I do have a set of 235/75 wranglers that will go on after the lift is done.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:33 pm |
|
|
they are about 29" i think. thats 11.5% bigger than standard.
with 4.3 diffs you will only be out 6.5 %, so might be worth doing.
and if you add a sierra transfer (w/T) it would give you a further 6.7 % and a total of 13.2 % reduction be good for 29's or even 30"
|
|
|
|
 |
Bugsta
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 1754 Location: North Brisbane
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:55 pm |
|
suzooky87 wrote: they are about 29" i think. thats 11.5% bigger than standard. with 4.3 diffs you will only be out 6.5 %, so might be worth doing. and if you add a sierra transfer (w/T) it would give you a further 6.7 % and a total of 13.2 % reduction be good for 29's or even 30"
What sierra case (ratios) are you referring to here? Is this 6.7% both high and low?
And what is his OEM box 1;2 or 1.3;2.6?
_________________ If you can read this, please tip me back over
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:37 am |
|
Bugsta wrote: suzooky87 wrote: they are about 29" i think. thats 11.5% bigger than standard. with 4.3 diffs you will only be out 6.5 %, so might be worth doing. and if you add a sierra transfer (w/T) it would give you a further 6.7 % and a total of 13.2 % reduction be good for 29's or even 30" What sierra case (ratios) are you referring to here? Is this 6.7% both high and low? And what is his OEM box 1;2 or 1.3;2.6?
As i said a sierra W/T transfer (standard widetrack 1.409:1 in high and 2.268:1 in low).
The figures above are in reference to high range with the assumption that he would have a manual transmission. With that in mind, i had forgotten to ask a few important questions about his set up, my bad.
I will have to check if there are different ratios for the auto for the 99 model i have heard that it could be 1:1.
If not auto then i know that the transfer ratio is 1.320:1 in high and i think low is about 2.145:1.
|
|
|
|
 |
Bugsta
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 1754 Location: North Brisbane
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 7:43 pm |
|
|
From what I understand, all Jim T-cases are exactly double in low what they are in high. So changing to that Sierra case is going to increase high and at the very least, more than low, and do very little for low, unless a crawler set is installed as well.
_________________ If you can read this, please tip me back over
|
|
|
|
 |
4x4srcool
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:57 pm Posts: 5 Location: adelaide
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:16 pm |
|
|
|
 |
joel
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2191 Location: Dirranbandi
Vehicle: Sj70 tintop
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:17 pm |
|
|
^^^^ this kids got form, farking quick typer to ya little squirt
_________________ Sj70 tintop
|
|
|
|
 |
Bombero
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:46 pm Posts: 84 Location: Vic
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:13 am |
|
|
Just run the 4.3 in the back whith bigger tyres. That should allow for a difference in gearing.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:59 am |
|
Bugsta wrote: From what I understand, all Jim T-cases are exactly double in low what they are in high. So changing to that Sierra case is going to increase high and at the very least, more than low, and do very little for low, unless a crawler set is installed as well.
I have been inclined to believe differently.
The later model Jimny (2005+) have ratios of 1.00:1-high, 2.643:1-low and 4.3:1-diff for the manual and 1.32:1-high, 2.002:1-low and 4.09:1-diff in the Auto.
The early model jimny (2004-) have ratios of 1.32:1-high, 2.145:1-low and 4.09:1-diff for the manual and for the auto i am not sure so i will just leave that one alone.
In this particular case we are talking about the 2004- model. He has ratios of 1.32:1-High, 2.145:1-Low and 4.09:-Diff. The Sierra W/T transfers have ratios of 1.409:1-High and 2.268:1-Low. between these two transfer cases, when you do the calculations, you can see that there is a 6.5% reduction in High and a 5.6% reduction in low. so yes there is 1% less reduction for low range but that is not going to make too much difference. When and if he adds the 4.3:1 Diffs he would then gain a further 5% reduction in both high and low, giving him a total of 11.5% reduction in high and 10.6% reduction in low. As i said this is one way to correct the gearing for 235 (29) tyres which are 10% bigger.
That is all................
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:01 am |
|
Bombero wrote: Just run the 4.3 in the back whith bigger tyres. That should allow for a difference in gearing.

|
|
|
|
 |
|