| Author |
Message |
TomDK
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 1:19 am |
|
|
Hi
Looking into what actual sizes are of the following:
Silverstone MT117 Extreme 31/10.5 R15 and 33/10.5 R15 and R16
Asking because I know there's quite a difference between R15 and R16 in 35" versions.
Can anyone help out here?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
Eddy
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 381 Location: Waikerie
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:05 am |
|
|
Have a set in 31/10.5r15 ... such a cute little tyre ... Back at the old place atm and can't recall actual measurements right now, but I do recall they are the same size as a near bald 30/9.5r15 hankook muddy, and a good 1/2 inch lower than 31/10.5 bridgestone 604v desert duelers. For shits and giggles one day I mounted one on a stock Vitara rim. Having seen a few of them, I'd suggest that the writing on the sidewall is strictly for their own catalogue listing, and has no relevance to actual dimensions.
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4530 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:42 am |
|
|
Mine measured 31.2" when new.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:26 am |
|
The 31's or they 33's 
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4530 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:49 am |
|
|
Sorry, they were 31's. I had another set of 31x10.5R15's that measured 30.3" but they weren't new when I measured them (they came on a car). They seem to change size from batch to batch.
|
|
|
|
 |
just_cruizin

az supporter
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 2867 Location: here
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:22 am |
|
 That was hard 33's - 32.7 31's - 31.7 I do believe the 33's are a new mould though as the designs seems to have been slightly improved
_________________ greenzook89 wrote: 31zook wrote: Makes me want something similar
|
|
|
|
 |
Eddy
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 381 Location: Waikerie
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:35 am |
|
just_cruizin wrote: lol ... I believe the OP is after actual size, not fictitious printout from the manufacturer 
|
|
|
|
 |
just_cruizin

az supporter
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 2867 Location: here
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:42 am |
|
|
I think you'll find the column on the right quite accurate having had 31's, 33's & 35's. Previously their site listed the 33x10.5's as somewhere about 820. Back before the 9.5's were available
_________________ greenzook89 wrote: 31zook wrote: Makes me want something similar
|
|
|
|
 |
Eddy
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 381 Location: Waikerie
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:46 am |
|
|
781mm is 30.7 (ish) btw
Just measured. 29.9" on 7" rim at 16 psi. Tread 99% ... pimples still just visible.
|
|
|
|
 |
TomDK
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:46 pm |
|
Eddy wrote: just_cruizin wrote: lol ... I believe the OP is after actual size, not fictitious printout from the manufacturer  Exactly. That list is pretty much useless. Measured my buddy's 31/10.5 R16 yesterday. New tyres, only done a few miles. Measured around 29.9" with 25 psi. Also the width on this list is way off. Same 31's R16 are more like 235mm wide. But thank you guys. I think we can conclude that Silverstone 31's generally are smaller than listed as. But that it also differs from batch to batch. Oddly with Simex it's the other way around.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:32 pm |
|
|
Silverstone were the ones that measures small. It's Simex (the design Silverstone copied) that the 31's measure 32.something - I had Simex 31's and this was certainly the case.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
THE_DICTATOR
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:09 pm Posts: 140
Vehicle: Suzuki Jimny
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:58 pm |
|
|
Have owned 31x10.5 and they were small, close to 30x9.5. Also had 33x9.5 and they were pretty much spot on.
_________________ hillbilly 2 wrote: And this ^^^^ clown is why auszookers will never be taken seriously
|
|
|
|
 |
TomDK
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:49 pm |
|
I asked my local 4x4 shop for 32" Simex ET's. He told me they measured something like 33.5". So a no go for me 
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 11:40 pm |
|
|
So go the 31x10.5 knowing you'll get a 32?
That said, they're a pretty shit tyre in anything other than utter slop. I HATED mine when i had them... they got me into trouble SO many times with next to no lateral grip (ie: on a cross slope, you slide down it while driving either forward or backward).
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
TomDK
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:54 am |
|
|
Yes pretty much.
I've been running Insa Turbo Special Track for 4 years now. Simex copy. But still. Excellent tyre. Must be a reason why they've been so popular for years.
No lateral grip? I couldn't disagree more. The lateral grip is in my experience excellent.
Sounds more like you're talking about Boggers than Simex ET's. Because Boggers are shit in anything else but mud and has no lateral grip at all.
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:00 am |
|
|
I ran the 32*9.5 (33.4 actual) for years. Grip in vic mud and clay they were fantastic. On side slopes, road and wet rock they sucked
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:47 am |
|
|
Tom, your experience of lateral grip with the Insa might be due (in part) to the carcass. Silverstone's are bias ply IIRC, which generally erodes lateral stability, whilst your Insa's would have been based on a radial carcass.
Having said that, the increased flexibility of the tread in a bias ply tyre generally makes them superior for off road work.
I would agree with JDK's assessment, although I haven't run them myself.
|
|
|
|
 |
Red89
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2801 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 7:01 pm |
|
I loved my 32x9.5 Simex Extremes, they were awesome in mud and did well on rocks considering they are predominantly a mud tyre. Even won a couple rock comps thanks to them. 
_________________ Made in JP. Built in WA.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:12 pm |
|
|
You could have won those comps 10x over on a better tyre though... just sayin' =)
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
|