It is currently Mon Jul 27, 2026 6:51 pm
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am
Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 1:19 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Hi

Looking into what actual sizes are of the following:

Silverstone MT117 Extreme 31/10.5 R15 and 33/10.5 R15 and R16

Asking because I know there's quite a difference between R15 and R16 in 35" versions.

Can anyone help out here?

Thanks

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 381
Location: Waikerie

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:05 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Have a set in 31/10.5r15 ... such a cute little tyre ...
Back at the old place atm and can't recall actual measurements right now, but I do recall they are the same size as a near bald 30/9.5r15 hankook muddy, and a good 1/2 inch lower than 31/10.5 bridgestone 604v desert duelers.
For shits and giggles one day I mounted one on a stock Vitara rim.
Having seen a few of them, I'd suggest that the writing on the sidewall is strictly for their own catalogue listing, and has no relevance to actual dimensions.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 4530
Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:42 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Mine measured 31.2" when new.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:26 am 
Reply with quote Top  
The 31's or they 33's :D

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 4530
Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:49 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Sorry, they were 31's. I had another set of 31x10.5R15's that measured 30.3" but they weren't new when I measured them (they came on a car). They seem to change size from batch to batch.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter

Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 2867
Location: here

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:22 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Image

That was hard

33's - 32.7
31's - 31.7

I do believe the 33's are a new mould though as the designs seems to have been slightly improved

_________________
greenzook89 wrote:
31zook wrote:
Makes me want something similar

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 381
Location: Waikerie

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:35 am 
Reply with quote Top  
just_cruizin wrote:
Image

lol ... I believe the OP is after actual size, not fictitious printout from the manufacturer :lol:

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter

Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 2867
Location: here

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:42 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I think you'll find the column on the right quite accurate having had 31's, 33's & 35's. Previously their site listed the 33x10.5's as somewhere about 820. Back before the 9.5's were available

_________________
greenzook89 wrote:
31zook wrote:
Makes me want something similar

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 381
Location: Waikerie

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:46 am 
Reply with quote Top  
781mm is 30.7 (ish) btw

Just measured. 29.9" on 7" rim at 16 psi.
Tread 99% ... pimples still just visible.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am
Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:46 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Eddy wrote:
just_cruizin wrote:
Image

lol ... I believe the OP is after actual size, not fictitious printout from the manufacturer :lol:


Exactly.
That list is pretty much useless.
Measured my buddy's 31/10.5 R16 yesterday. New tyres, only done a few miles. Measured around 29.9" with 25 psi.

Also the width on this list is way off. Same 31's R16 are more like 235mm wide.

But thank you guys.
I think we can conclude that Silverstone 31's generally are smaller than listed as. But that it also differs from batch to batch.

Oddly with Simex it's the other way around.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:32 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Silverstone were the ones that measures small. It's Simex (the design Silverstone copied) that the 31's measure 32.something - I had Simex 31's and this was certainly the case.

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:09 pm
Posts: 140
Vehicle: Suzuki Jimny

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:58 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Have owned 31x10.5 and they were small, close to 30x9.5. Also had 33x9.5 and they were pretty much spot on.

_________________
hillbilly 2 wrote:
And this ^^^^ clown is why auszookers will never be taken seriously

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am
Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:49 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I asked my local 4x4 shop for 32" Simex ET's. He told me they measured something like 33.5". So a no go for me :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 11:40 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
So go the 31x10.5 knowing you'll get a 32?

That said, they're a pretty shit tyre in anything other than utter slop. I HATED mine when i had them... they got me into trouble SO many times with next to no lateral grip (ie: on a cross slope, you slide down it while driving either forward or backward).

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am
Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny

Post Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:54 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Yes pretty much.

I've been running Insa Turbo Special Track for 4 years now. Simex copy. But still. Excellent tyre. Must be a reason why they've been so popular for years.

No lateral grip? I couldn't disagree more. The lateral grip is in my experience excellent.

Sounds more like you're talking about Boggers than Simex ET's. Because Boggers are shit in anything else but mud and has no lateral grip at all.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:00 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I ran the 32*9.5 (33.4 actual) for years.
Grip in vic mud and clay they were fantastic.
On side slopes, road and wet rock they sucked

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:47 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Tom, your experience of lateral grip with the Insa might be due (in part) to the carcass. Silverstone's are bias ply IIRC, which generally erodes lateral stability, whilst your Insa's would have been based on a radial carcass.

Having said that, the increased flexibility of the tread in a bias ply tyre generally makes them superior for off road work.

I would agree with JDK's assessment, although I haven't run them myself.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 2801
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 7:01 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I loved my 32x9.5 Simex Extremes, they were awesome in mud and did well on rocks considering they are predominantly a mud tyre. Even won a couple rock comps thanks to them.

Image

_________________
Made in JP. Built in WA.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:12 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
You could have won those comps 10x over on a better tyre though... just sayin' =)

_________________
Image

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 302 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours